![]() It’s not the first time that streaking has figured into an online gambling story. “We will continue to make sure that any publicity stunts or ill-intended behavior cannot adversely affect the outcome of a player’s wager.” “Our players have always trusted us to ensure the integrity of all props offered in our sportsbook,”Bovada stated. At the very least, the event is likely to make Bovada reconsider offering prop bets of this nature, ones that have the potential to disrupt larger sporting events. Bovada’s lines appear prominently throughout the US’s sports-betting world, on broadcasts and in live and online publications, and as a consequence the site remains under considerable pressure from the US’s growing licensed and regulated markets. The episode will likely do no publicity favors for Bovada, however, despite the site’s willingness to take a moderate financial hit. ![]() As a result, Bovada has already announced it will refund the wagers of all “no” bettors, while also screening for legitimacy all “yes” wagers made before officially grading them. The site had already been aware of “suspicious activity” on the prop line, likely the overly large $50,000 wager. However, Bovada, a grey-market betting site offering services to many US states, quickly learned of Andrade’s admission. Andrade told the show’s audience that his group had locked in the bet at +750, resulting in the high would-be payout. Yuri Andrade, the 31-year-old Florida man who briefly disrupted the game with his run in a pink leotard and black shorts, announced in an apperance on a Florida radio station Wild 94.1 talk show that he was part of a group that had bet $50,000 that a streaker would appear. Perez wrote that one bettor who said he had no prior knowledge of the stunt had already had his account shut down by Bovada.Online sportsbook Bovada likely won’t be paying out the largest supposedly winning wager on whether a streaker would disrupt the Super Bowl LV game between the Kansas City Chiefs and Tampa Bay Buccaneers after the site discovered the streaker was part of a group having placed a large bet on such an event occurring during the game. ![]() "We will continue to make sure that any publicity stunts or ill-intended behavior cannot adversely affect the outcome of a player's wager."Īccording to Perez, Bovada is refunding those that wagered there would not be a fan on the field during the game and paying out winning bets for accounts that were not linked to early knowledge of Andrade's plan. "Our players have always trusted us to ensure the integrity of all props offered in our sportsbook," a Bovada spokesman told Perez. ![]() Perez at Front Office Sports, Bovada was working to identify accounts that knew of Andrade's planned stunt. With several smaller wagers rather than one big $50,000, it's more conceivable that Andrade could have gotten a healthy wager down on his run.Īccording to a report from A.J. They bet that there would be a fan on the field at +750 odds. ![]() But despite initial suspicions, it appears that there was some truth to Andrade's claim, though he still won't be cashing in on his run.Īndrade told a Tampa radio station that he had gotten friends to place wagers from different accounts on the gambling site Bovada. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |